But you May Not Like it . . .
The Middle East and Then the World|
Beginning in North Africa, now unfolding in the Middle East and Iran, and soon to spread to Eastern Europe and Asia, the globalist fueled color revolutions are attempting to profoundly transform entire regions of the planet in one sweeping move.
The End Game is a World-Spanning System of Global Governance, with the US effectively in charge. This is a system controlled by Anglo-American financiers and their network of global institutions ensuring the world’s consolidated nations conform to a singular system they can then perpetually fleece.
The entire Middle East and North Africa are in the process of (largely) CIA-financed and sponsored upheavals. Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are only a part of the overall plan. In partnership with Israel and Saudi Arabia, the US intends to "cleanse" the entire Middle East of obstacles to absolute control - primarily of the oil, but also of the geopolitical advantages.
The revolutions in Egypt, the upsets in Syria, Lebanon, Tunisia, Yemen, Morocco, and other nations, did not occur by accident. They were planned and caused.
The US did the same, following the same plans and manuals, with their "color" and other revolutions and uprisings in the Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgistan, and the entire bloc of Yugoslavia and the Balkans. The breakup of Yugoslavia, the demonisation, destruction and eventual isolation of Serbia, were all according to plan. Pakistan will soon follow.
In fact, the manuals prepared by the CIA to launch the dissention in Serbia and the breakup of Yugoslavia were so successful a template that they have been used repeatedly in more than a dozen other countries. You can read them in this section - and perhaps learn how to overthrow your own government.
The US has expended much effort in encircling and containing China, in large part by attempting to strengthen military and other alliances with South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, the Philppines, Indonesia, India and others. It has encouraged Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philppines to become belligerent about their interests, real or imagined, in the South China Sea.
The US has markedly increased its U-2 spy plane flights over China, as well as its spy ships off Hainan Island to learn about China's submarine bases and programs, to say nothing of promoting arms sales to Taiwan to further destabilise the region.
The US has constantly provoked Pakistan and North Korea, as well as demonising Iran for years - all in preparation for more "wars of liberation". It is the US intention to finish the job it began in Korea, to provoke a war and "conquer" the North, to obtain the opportunity to place troops, artillery, missile bases and all manner of weapons on China's border.
The two Koreas have often been amenable to reunification, but those plans were in each case dashed by the US for its own political agenda of regional hegemony. A unified Korea is politically and militarily useless to the US. The US has always planned to "reunify" Korea, but under its terms where the US would continue to control the entire peninsula, and a self-reunification would nullify these plans.
It is very possible, if not likely, that the US already has well-advanced plans for an eventual war with China, which would account for the exaggerated emphasis on regional interference during the past few years. It would also account for the outrageous volume of media demonisation of China in the West - primarily the US - since this is always the prelude to a US war of aggresssion.
This is the reason China is establishing its own GPS system; when a conflict does come, the US would simply cut off all GPS signals to China, leaving the country helpless. This is also the explanation for China's military development strategy. Long-range, supersonic "carrier-killer" missiles, stealth submarine technology, as well as a strong emphasis on its own drone and stealth aircraft.
These will all be necessary to combat the US effectively. China is also developing aircraft carrier technology and experience, not to fight carrier battles with the US, but to identify weaknesses to be exploited as well as to obtain some short-range effectiveness in the South China Sea.
It is also one of the principal reasons for US activity in the Middle East - to obtain virtually total control of all petroleum resources and have the ability to cut China off almost completely.
China had huge petroleum investments in Libya and more than 30,000 people there, all of whom had to be evacuated when NATO attacked. The US controls Iraq and the Gulf States like Kuwait and Bahrain, and the deep ties between the Bushes and the Saudi clan will ensure cooperation in blocking China should the need arise.
This is also one of the considerations in the US plans to use the resources of NATO to finally invade Iran for a second time - obtain control of the oil supply but also cut China off when the time comes.
The easiest way to conquer a country militarily is to cut off its petroleum supplies, thereby rendering it literally "dead in the water".
It is for these reasons that we read so many comments about the US wanting China to become "a responsible stakeholder" in the "international system". The phrases are simply a euphemism for military, political and economic colonisation by the US and the New World Order. In this case, the "system" is as described, with the US in control of the world, with the "stakeholders" being effectively vassals in a new system of world slavery.
The US bitterly resents the Shanghai Cooperation Association formed by China and Russia in an attempt to counter these US intentions, and is doing everything possible to sabotage the success of this group.
It is no secret that the US is disturbed by the vast progress made by China on the African continent, the infrastructure being built, the pipelines, power stations, railroads, and the consequent development of the region. Even more disturbing is China's willingness to lend cash on favorable terms to these countries, thereby emasculating the IMF and removing the one real source of power and influence of the US and the West over the continent - short of military invasion, of course.
But the military invasions may come anyway. Libya is a good current example and Ethiopia has been the "beneficiary" of US and Western interference as have many other African nations.
But nevertheless, it wasn't for nothing that Hillary Clinton made her much-publicised trip to Zambia, Tanzania and Ethiopia, "warning" those countries about "neo-colonialism". The Africans would have to be asleep to not read her true intentions, so the US may have an uphill battle in colonising Africa into its New Order.
There are few nations that would rather not deal with China, who lends money on favorable terms and doesn't include political and military interference as preconditions for aid. The Africans would also by now be quite aware that China does not export revolution and poverty, and does not interfere in a trading nation's domestic affairs.
US encircling of Russia has been continuing on an aggressive timetable for many years. The US, through the CIA, financed and planned the uprising and war with Georgia, bought and paid for the government of Kirgystan - resulting in a bloody ethnic feud, resentment and mini-revolution - satisfied by yet more payoffs to the new government.
The revolution in the Ukraine was planned, instigated, led and financed by the CIA - only to fail at the end, but not for lack of trying. The war in Georgia, a risky and dangerous ploy, also failed.
Russia, as with China, is one of the unsatisfactory elements in the plans for this New Order since these two countries appear unwilling to be colonised by the US. Putin in particluar, is nobody's fool, and sees only too clearly the intent and direction of the US.
Readers may be unaware that it was the US that was primarily responsible for the grand push for the European Union and the common currency of the Euro, having strongly promoted this since the end of the Second War.
Readers may also be unaware that membership in NATO is a prerequisite for nations to be accepted into the European Union. And to do so, these new nation-states must subordinate their militaries to NATO. If that doesn't frighten you, more reading on your part is indicated.
NATO had no purpose after World War II, but the US kept it alive as a kind of Cold War and espionage organisation. And the organisation should have died after the breakup of the Soviet Union, but the US had greater plans to turn NATO into a kind of supranational military that would be under its control but be responsible to no nation or institution - in fact, a rogue military with enormous power and no oversight.
The US has already realised it cannot conquer the entire world by itself. That was the reason for George Bush's "coalition of the unwilling" in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the reason for the pretence of the invasion of Libya being under the auspices of NATO.
NATO is fully under the control of the US, aided by a few Right-Wing allies like the UK, France and Germany. The rest of Europe is too small and fragmented to have the power to stand up to this group, and this is the reasoning behind the subordination of all these other militaries to NATO. In conjunction with the US military, all the individual armies, navies and air forces of the entire European Bloc will be under the control of the US.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn was eviscerated entirely because he refused to accommodate the architects of this new order. He pushed hard for an end to the US dollar as the world's reserve currency and spoke out sharply against the IMF's predatory colonial practices that kept developing countries forever poor for the sake of enriching the major international banks. Christine Lagarde, a much more pliable corporatist-Zionist-Bilderberger is now in the saddle - unless her corruption crimes land her in prison.
The IMF is a particularly important gear in this World Order Machine since it can influence and control the very survival of many poorer or developing countries. It can in particular force "austerity programs" onto nations in economic distress, thereby protecting the large banks in this new order while ensuring subjugation of the nation-states. This has repeatedly been seen in countries on all continents, from Central and South America to Greece today.
This is the secret organisation that has been meeting for 60 or 70 years and which, for all that time, steadfastly denied all claims of its very existence, long attributing these stories to "conspiracy theorists". It is only in the past two or three years that membership and attendance lists have been obtained and the group - which finally acknowledges its own existence - is apparently prepared to emerge into the open.
This is a group of some of the most powerful and influential citizens of the world, meeting regularly to lay plans for this New World Order. The membership is composed of national leaders, industrialists, military personnel including especially NATO, some royalty, most of the world's most prominent bankers and a huge number of avowed Zionists.
Many of these private bankers like the Rothschilds group, are said to control trillions of dollars, sufficient that they alone had the resources to finance the wars of many nations for several hundreds of years. Most of these are secret members whose names do not appear on any attendance list.
It is worth noting that, in terms of population size, Israel (as a nation) and Jewish industrialists and bankers are heavily and disproportionately represented, as are Zionists generally. This section contains lists of some of the confirmed attendees at recent meetings. You can do the math for yourself.
In the end, we will have a unified European Bloc of only three major players - the UK, France, Germany - firmly under the wing of the US. There will be a great many less powerful members who must obey or be ostracised. A Romania or a Greece cannot survive alone, outside the group; even without military aggression, economic sanctions by the US-led group would be sufficient to destroy them.
This group of Right-Wing countries, led by the US, would have under its control the enormous miiltary arsenal of NATO, sufficient to subjugate anyone within Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The prize, of course, is access to, and control of, all the resources within Europe itself, but especially within the Middle East and Africa.
The US is, at the same time, laying all the groundwork for an Asian version of the European bloc, gathering all possible allies, interfering politically in all unfriendly or undecided nations to either topple governments, foster revolutions or enforce compliance with cash and military hardware.
South and Central America will simply become one more "area of influence" for the US, and most likely an enlarged NATO, to dominate and continue plundering - as it has for the past 100 or more years.
In the end, the plan is that all nations of the world, organised into these few blocs, controlled regionally by a few strong allies, will all be formally under the control of the US. No nation would be able to escape either the economic or military sanctions that would ensue for "disobedience". Nations will lose control of their militaries, their currencies and much of their economies as well, to say nothing of their resources being plundered by this Western group.