 | ||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | ||||||||
 |
Trashing the Truth, Part 3 - Wikipedia |
|
Wikipedia, the open-source internet encyclopedia, is Jewish-owned and managed, as are Google, Facebook, Twitter and various other far-reaching and influential social media. Wikipedia no doubt has countless conscientious contributors who make a serious effort to place enormous amounts of information online, to the benefit of all. However, Wikipedia presents a particluar problem in that its Jewish roots appear to create a definite editorial bias on any content related to Israel or the Jews. From all the pages we have examined in this context, it seems that only favorable history is permitted to be recorded. Even worse, any attempt to edit these pages and include a more comprehensive - and more accurate - recording of historical events, appears doomed to failure. These edited pages are swiftly deleted and replaced with the originals. A number of editors have complained that any repeated editing attempt will result in the pages being 'locked', with further editing impossible. It is also annoying that most searches on Google, at least by this author, will almost invariably find several Wikipedia pages placed prominently at the top of the list, even if they are not the most relevant. One can hardly avoid theorising that this is not accidental or simply due to Wikipedia having the highest contexual ranking, but rather part of a plan to give prominence to Wikipedia's opinion-based editorial position on many international matters. And Wikipedia definitely appears to have opinion-based editorial positions on many international matters. On some of these, especially concerning China, the information presented is patently false but is unable to be edited. One example is the entry on China's '50-cent party', the imaginary government-sponsored hordes who scan the internet for entries on China and attempt to sanitise China's image. The claim might be a joke if it weren't so hypocritical, since it is Israel and international Jewry who do this on their own behalf, with no evidence whatever that this has ever been done by China. The rumors of this so-called 50-cent party were begun by David Bandurski - who is Jewish - at the George Soros-sponsored China Media Project in Hong Kong. Bandurski claimed the Chinese government had 280,000 people engaged in this enterprise. His claim was just fabricated nonsense since, even if such an enterprise existed, Bandurski would have no access to such detailed information. One Western reporter was on record as stating that "Bandurski just pulled that number out of his ass." But this is one example of Wikipedia's ideological and editorial bias, where the posted information was totally fabricated, and is now protected. And, I would have to say, an apparent example of media control, censorship, and an appalling disregard for the truth. On other matters more directly related to Jewish interests, for example the Sassoons' exclusive China opium franchise, the Jewish families are mentioned only in relation to their wealth or the building of synagogues, and any mention of opium is attributed to 'the British' - who of course were these same Jewish families with British passports. On listings of the Black Slave Trade, Wikipedia dismisses the Jewish involvment as minor, but many historical reports suggest it was no such thing. Again, this section is not accessible for editing and provision of a more complete historical record. On items dealing with Palestine, everything is heavily censored and sanitised, and it would seem that no 'outsiders' are permitted editing privileges - including Jews for Justice in the Middle East, if my information is correct. The next sections deal with China, and will demonstrate clearly the extent of the depth and the reach of this Jewish "Hasbara" lobby, that I believe we all need to understand. An article mini-series in 7 parts: |